Dr. Jeffrey P. Olson, MD Physician in Los Angeles, California 90064

Name: Jeffrey P. Olson, MD
Last name: Olson
Began aesthetic medicine in: 2010
Years experience: 13
Primary Specialty: Physician
Business: JPO Aesthetics / Charlotte James Facial Care
Address: 2211 Corinth Ave.
Address suite: Ste. 100
City: Los Angeles
State: California
Zip Code: 90064
Country: US
Consulting Fees: 200$
Has Sponsored Offer : No
Clinical Privileges
  • Cottage Hospital
  • Mercy Hospitals of Bakersfield
  • Medical: MD, Chicago Medical School
Postdoc Training
  • Residency: University of Chicago Hospitals, 1999
GPS coordinates on map: 34.0522,-118.2429962

Primary location
Location name: Los Angeles
State: CA
Country: US
Map point: 34.0522,-118.2429962

Jeffrey P. Olson, MD

  • Bellafill
  • Belotero
  • Botox
  • Botox for Migraines
  • Chemical Peel
  • Collagen Injection
  • Derma Roller
  • Dermabrasion
  • Dermal Fillers
  • Dermapen
  • Dysport
  • Electrolysis
  • Exilis
  • Facial
  • Glycolic Peel
  • Hair Loss Treatment
  • Hand Rejuvenation
  • Hyaluronidase
  • Juvederm
  • Kybella
  • Latisse
  • LED Light Therapy
  • Lip Fillers
  • Liquid Facelift
  • Microdermabrasion
  • Microneedling
  • Nonsurgical Facelift
  • Nonsurgical Neck Lift
  • Nonsurgical Nose Job
  • Restylane
  • Restylane Lyft
  • Restylane Silk
  • Retin-A
  • Salicylic Peel
  • Sculptra
  • Skin Lightening
  • Skin Rejuvenation
  • TCA Peel
  • Vanquish
  • VI Peel
  • Volbella
  • Vollure
  • Voluma
  • Xeomin

RealSelf Info

Rating: 5.0
Profile views: 528
Answer count: 5
Review count: 3
Star rating: 2.0473720558371
Profile created: Jan 31, 2018
Profile modified: Oct 2, 2019
Profile promotion: No
Profile inactive: No
Premier status: Free
Tier: Free-Unclaimed
RealCare Promise: No
Directory link: Physician
RealSelf’s PRO: No
Doctor Designation Start Time: Feb 20, 2018
Doctor Designation End Time: Jan 1, 2033


  • Los Angeles, CA, US. GPS coordinates: 34.0522,-118.2429962

Latest ratings of treatments

  • Kybella (Jul 2017) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Botox (Sep 2023) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Injectable Fillers (Sep 2023) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Injectable Fillers (Nov 2018) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Injectable Fillers (Nov 2018) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Botox (Nov 2018) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Botox (Nov 2018) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Kybella (Jul 2017) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Kybella (Jul 2017) – Overall rating: 5/5
  • Kybella (Jul 2017) – Overall rating: 5/5

Doctor’s answers

Answer Header & Date
Answer Snippet
Tear through options?
Good candidate
Mar 8, 2018
Thanks lori1987.
You do have beautiful eyes!
I would say the volume deficit here simply seems more pronounced as we are drawn to noting this prominent feature for you. The crease thankfully does not cross mid pupil so it would qualify as a Grade II deformity (mild-moderate).
An injector skilled in this area is key but it is fairly well tolerated despite a potentially anxiety- provoking location. I use topical anesthetic and ice in part to minimize risk of bruising which…
What are the chances of developing keloids after two syringes of Sculptra?
Very low risk
Mar 3, 2018
Hello and thanks for your question.
Firstly, I’m sorry this wasn’t elucidated further in your history and consultation. Rest assured, I would say the risk of keloid formation is minimal.
Now, we have to distinguish between keloids and the unique risk with any filler but especially biostimulators like Sculptra – nodules and/ or granulomas. Nodules can form due to an accumulation or bunching of product. Often small and can be felt, are palpable, but usu…
Is Vanquish painful? Are there any side effects?
Feb 19, 2018
Vanquish is extremely well tolerated and effective.
Patients often take a nap while undergoing a treatment.
Although unclear of incidence- estimate 10% in my patients- panniculitis – or uneven fat dissolution that may result in nodules of fatty tissue that one may feel but are usually not be visible. They may be slightly painful requiring some OTC pain meds or in the extreme case delaying a treatment a few days. Overall, they tend to resolve or drastically decrease in…
Which is better for fat loss–Vanquish or Coolsculpting?
Patient selection vs science
Feb 19, 2018
Thank you and this is the quintessential question as new therapies arrive in the marketplace. Which is better? I would say truly, it is based on your need upon examination and assessment and desires or goals.
The science supports a greater a depth of fat reduction looking at cross-sectioned tissue with Vanquish by perhaps 2 times as compared to Coolsculpting. It is also the only one I believe to have had a small study of long term (4 year) maintenance- of 75% of…
I am interested in Vanquis ME but have a colostomy and wondered if I would be able to have such a
Feb 19, 2018
I would agree that I would not risk injury to friable mucosal tissue with radio frequency energy/heat. Coolsculpting would be the alternative for noninvasive treatment of adipose but would take some skill to place appropriately to achieve an even, aesthetic result.
Ideally, Coolsculpting (or Vanquish) after reversal of the colostomy if that’s an option knowing that scar tissue can absorb more heat and the energy may have to be adjusted to pain tolerance.

Last updated on 12/19/2023